حلال المشاكل
19/09/2010, 04:40 AM
In most things I shoot I can't agree a 22 airgun does that much more damage or out preforms a 177 air gun. In certain instances it does make a difference, but most of the time not that big of a difference. In the target in the video, the top reflector was shot with a 177 air gun and the bottom a 22 airgun, it's hard to see any difference at all.
But a 7.9 gr 177 cal pellet shooting at 1000 fps will produce 17.55 ft lbs of energy.
A 14.3 gr 22 cal pellet traqveling at 750 fps will deliver 17.87 ft lbs of energy, a difference of .32 ft lbs!
Of course we can change them numbers a little bit and come up with the following figures.....
A 177 10.5 gr gr pellet traveling at 900 fps developes 18.89 ft lbs of energy, more energy then the 14.3 gr 22 cal pellet traveling at 750 fps.
If we take the 22 cal and jump it up to 23 gr traveling at 750 fps, we end up with 28.73 ft lbs of energy.
But in the end, which is better? a 177 cal 7.9 gr traveling at 1000 fps producing 17.55 ft lbs of energy, or a 22 cal pellet weighing 14.3 gr, traveling at 700 fps and producing 15.59 ft lbs of energy? The 177 produced more energy then the 22.
What this boils down to is "I think", one gun is no better then the other. Yes, the 22 will make a little bigger hole, but a lot depends on the weight and speed of the pellet. The more a pelet weighs and the faster it travels, the more energy it developes.
Even if I shoot a larger 16.1 gr pellet out of the 177 which slows down to 700 fps, it will still only produce 15.55 ft lbs of energy! If there was some way to speed that pellet up to 1000 fps, the energy would go up to 35.76 ft lbs of energy! But that's not going to happen in to days airguns and probably not in the future either.
So the choice is yours, whatever you "think" is better. But what you think, and what is actual fact, may be very different. I believe though that today's "all" high powered air gun are powerful enough to take down small to medium game with the right shot placement.
The shots in the target in the video were taken at 25 yards using both Crosman hollow points, 7.9 in the 177 cal. and 14.3 in the 22 cal. I wasn't aiming at any certain spot, just trying to keep the shots seperate from each other. For the 177 shots I used the Crosman Storm XT and used the Walther Talon Magnum for the 22 cal shots.
اللي فهمته انهم ما بينهم فرق في الاثر التدميري فرق بسيط ل 22
54JtD7u7FaY
HW2iSMCS0zE
But a 7.9 gr 177 cal pellet shooting at 1000 fps will produce 17.55 ft lbs of energy.
A 14.3 gr 22 cal pellet traqveling at 750 fps will deliver 17.87 ft lbs of energy, a difference of .32 ft lbs!
Of course we can change them numbers a little bit and come up with the following figures.....
A 177 10.5 gr gr pellet traveling at 900 fps developes 18.89 ft lbs of energy, more energy then the 14.3 gr 22 cal pellet traveling at 750 fps.
If we take the 22 cal and jump it up to 23 gr traveling at 750 fps, we end up with 28.73 ft lbs of energy.
But in the end, which is better? a 177 cal 7.9 gr traveling at 1000 fps producing 17.55 ft lbs of energy, or a 22 cal pellet weighing 14.3 gr, traveling at 700 fps and producing 15.59 ft lbs of energy? The 177 produced more energy then the 22.
What this boils down to is "I think", one gun is no better then the other. Yes, the 22 will make a little bigger hole, but a lot depends on the weight and speed of the pellet. The more a pelet weighs and the faster it travels, the more energy it developes.
Even if I shoot a larger 16.1 gr pellet out of the 177 which slows down to 700 fps, it will still only produce 15.55 ft lbs of energy! If there was some way to speed that pellet up to 1000 fps, the energy would go up to 35.76 ft lbs of energy! But that's not going to happen in to days airguns and probably not in the future either.
So the choice is yours, whatever you "think" is better. But what you think, and what is actual fact, may be very different. I believe though that today's "all" high powered air gun are powerful enough to take down small to medium game with the right shot placement.
The shots in the target in the video were taken at 25 yards using both Crosman hollow points, 7.9 in the 177 cal. and 14.3 in the 22 cal. I wasn't aiming at any certain spot, just trying to keep the shots seperate from each other. For the 177 shots I used the Crosman Storm XT and used the Walther Talon Magnum for the 22 cal shots.
اللي فهمته انهم ما بينهم فرق في الاثر التدميري فرق بسيط ل 22
54JtD7u7FaY
HW2iSMCS0zE